Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:User8462/sandbox
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Not problematic, consensus to let it be. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 18:04, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Abandoned draft about non-notable band. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as abandoned. —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 13:19, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - This would have been deleted last year if it had been submitted for AFC review, and its submitter appears to have departed. If the submitter comes back, they can request undeletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep – per WP:STALEDRAFT, the best thing to do with an abandoned userspace draft is to
let it be
. If there's a good reason why that's not sufficient (and notability is not a good reason), replacing the text with Template:Userpage blanked is a valid alternative. But MfD deletion is reserved for seriously problematic material: if we had to spend a week debating every stale userspace draft, we'd be here for centuries. Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC) - Keep and feel free to blank, per Extraordinary Writ.—Alalch E. 21:23, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, feel free to blank. There’s nothing harmful in it. These things don’t need this attention. SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.